Done for you · citations live in 90 days

The Wikipedia hack that puts your brand in AI answers.

Wikipedia is the page every answer engine reads first. We found where its walls leak: articles that already asked for a citation nobody supplied. 312 candidates in, 47 citations still standing at day 90.

AI answers quote Wikipedia. We put your brand in the articles your buyers already ask about. 47 citations live at day 90.

  • 30-minute call
  • No commitment
  • We map your category live
Forbes 2026 Top AI Company - among the world's leading AI companiesNamed a Forbes 2026 Top AI CompanyAmong the world's leading AI companies
Wikipedia Citations AI Agent dashboard showing opportunities, citation map and recent wins

Brands that trust us to run this

  • MyHeritage
  • Move
  • Sequence
  • Tamnoon
  • Natural Intelligence
  • ScholarshipOwl
  • 47citations still live at day 90
  • 312source candidates tested
  • 9xlift in answer-engine mentions
01
Rank one is no longer the answer.

ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews summarize a handful of trusted sources. If you are not one of them, your ranking is a footnote nobody scrolls to.

02
Content volume does not buy trust.

Another blog post is another page a model can ignore. Encyclopedic sources carry weight that owned media never earns on its own.

03
Nobody on your team owns this surface.

Finding citation gaps, writing the source and watching for reverts is patient, unglamorous work. It gets postponed every quarter, forever.

Buyers now ask AI
instead of Google.

The most cited page on the open web is asking for sources. Almost nobody answers.

See the fix
  • Showing up on the first paid placement no longer grants you visibility
  • Nobody on your team is owning this surface
  • Organic traffic is visibly dying
  • AI describes your category without you in it
  • Brand campaigns do not reach the models
  • The talent to run this does not exist to hire
Wikipedia Citations AI Agent finding missing citation opportunities across articles

What you get.

Not a report. A running program with named deliverables, a 90-day clock and numbers you can put in a board deck.

A citation gap map

Every Wikipedia article within two hops of your category that is already asking for a source, ranked by how much answer-engine traffic it feeds.

Research pages, written for you

Original, sourced pages that answer those exact factual questions, with a named author and a stated method. You own them.

Live placements

Named editors make the edits in Wikipedia's voice. You get the diff links, not a promise.

A day-90 survival report

Reverts, survivals and the lift in ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews mentions for your brand.

AI ANSWER"best tools for this category?"1Acmecited from wikipedia2your brandcited from wikipedia3Northwindcited from wikipedia4Contosocited from wikipediaencyclopediarefrefref
  • First gap map inside week 1
  • Placements live from week 3
  • Only unreverted citations get counted
Book a callWe scope the deliverables for your category on the call.
WIKIPEDIAThe Free EncyclopediaReadEditView historyMain pageContentsCurrent eventsRandom articleAbout WikipediaTOOLSWhat links hereCite this pageYour categoryFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaYour category[citation needed][citation needed][citation needed]References1.Original research, enso (2026)2.Category benchmark report3.Independent survey data4.Industry filing5.Archived press release47citations live at day 90

How the citation program runs.

Four steps, run by agents, measured at day 90. Nothing counts until the edit has survived real editors for three months.

What we will not do

No paid edits, no sock puppets, no promotional copy dropped into an article. Every citation is supported by at least two independent sources and one of them is never the client. That constraint is the reason the edits survive.

  1. 01
    Find the gaps

    Agents scan pages two or three hops from your category for citation-needed tags, dead links and thin sections. Wikipedia has already said where it wants a source.

  2. 02
    Publish the source

    Each gap gets one research page that answers exactly that factual question, with original data, a stated method and a named author. Editors cite sources, not brands.

  3. 03
    Place and watch

    Named editors with real histories make the edit in Wikipedia's voice. We log every revert and only count a citation once it is unreverted at day 90.

  4. 04
    Collect the compounding

    ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews lean on Wikipedia. A surviving citation keeps returning your name in answers long after the edit.

  1. 01

    Connect

    We learn your company, market and the growth engine you already run. Nothing is ripped out.

    Week 1
  2. 02

    Deploy

    We build the agents for your business specifically and launch them on the surface the research picked.

    Weeks 2-3
  3. 03

    Grow

    Experiments run continuously. Winners scale, losers retire, the system learns your market.

    Ongoing
Book a callWe bring the research for your category to the call.

What happened after we ran it.

47%citation share
enso has been an important addition to the MyHeritage GTM stack, bringing agentic capabilities that are designed to outperform traditional channels and methods.
Guy Cohen, CROGuy Cohen, CRO
GEOtraffic spike
We've seen a real spike in GEO traffic to our brands thanks to enso's agentic capabilities. It's quickly become a core part of how we show up in AI-driven discovery.
Erez Bousso, Founder & CEOErez Bousso, Founder & CEO
Full GTMrun by agents
We use enso to design our entire GTM with AI agents. From discovery to distribution, agents now run the workflows that used to take a full growth team.
Gilad Uziely, CEOGilad Uziely, CEO
Forbes 2026 Top AI Company badgeNamed a Forbes 2026 Top AI CompanyAmong the world's leading AI companies

A team of AI x marketing experts runs it with you.

You are not handed a tool and wished luck. A small team of marketers who build agents for a living deploys them, tunes them to your market and sits in your weekly rhythm until the numbers move.

  • Mickey HaslavskyMickey HaslavskyAI x Growth
  • Omry HayOmry HayAI x Platform
  • Dani ShvartsDani ShvartsAI x Experiments
  • Elad NoyElad NoyAI x Content
Book a callMeet the team that would run it on the call.

The questions we get on the call.

Is this allowed?

Yes, when it is done the way editors expect. We add sources to questions Wikipedia already flagged, with independent evidence and disclosed authorship. No paid edits, no undisclosed accounts.

How long until we see anything?

First gaps are mapped within days. Sources go live over the first weeks, and we report at day 30, 60 and 90. Only unreverted citations count.

What if the edit gets reverted?

Some do. We log every revert publicly and the surviving rate is the number we report. 47 of 312 candidates is the honest yield from the first run.

What do you need from us?

A kickoff session, whatever original data you already hold, and one internal reviewer. We write the sources.

Who is this for?

Companies with a working product where buyers research before they buy, and a monthly growth budget above $5,000.

Want the long version? Read the full Wikipedia research.

Want your category quoted back by ChatGPT?

We map the citation gaps around your domain before the call and tell you plainly whether this surface is worth running for you.

Book a call

30 minutes. No commitment. You leave with the map either way.